Date of Assessment: 17 April to 9 June 2025. Pathways of Hope is a domiciliary care service providing support to people living at a supported living service. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive the regulated activity of personal care. This was the first inspection of the service’s provision within a supported living service. Systems and processes were in place to mitigate the risk of harm to people and to protect them from abuse. Staff had a clear understanding of their responsibilities under safeguarding, while the provider understood their regulatory responsibilities. People were involved in the management of risk to their care and support. People were supported by enough staff who had received the appropriate training to meet people’s needs. Appropriate infection control procedures were in place to keep people safe. The service promoted good health and wellbeing outcomes for people and to people’s quality of life. People received personalised care that was tailored to meet their individual needs, preferences and choices. Care plans were detailed and guided staff about people's needs and how to meet them. Concerns and complaints were listened to and used to improve the service they received. People, staff and relatives spoke positively about the registered manager. Management was approachable and open to feedback and discussions about people’s care. The quality of people’s care was supported by effective quality assurance systems. The registered manager encouraged feedback from people, staff and professionals involved in people’s care. The primary need of those people supported by Pathways of Hope at the supported living service was support with mental health, although two people had a secondary diagnosis of mild learning disability. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.
PDF cached but not yet analysed by Claude; set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY and re-run npm run etl:reports -- --location 1-8317268432.
Date of Assessment: 17 April to 9 June 2025. Pathways of Hope is a domiciliary care service providing support to people living in their own homes. Not everyone who used the service received personal care. CQC only inspects where people receive the regulated activity of personal care. The assessment was carried out to assess improvements since the last inspection. At this assessment improvements had been made. Systems and processes were in place to mitigate the risk of harm to people and to protect them from abuse. Staff had a clear understanding of their responsibilities under safeguarding, while the provider understood their regulatory responsibilities. People were involved in the management of risk to their care and support. People were supported by enough staff who had received the appropriate training to meet people’s needs. Appropriate infection control procedures were in place to keep people safe. People now received personalised care that was tailored to meet their individual needs, preferences and choices. Care plans were now detailed and guided staff about people's needs and how to meet them. Concerns and complaints were listened to and used to improve the service they received. People, staff and relatives spoke positively about the registered manager. Management was approachable and open to feedback and discussions about people’s care. The quality of people’s care was supported by effective quality assurance systems. The registered manager encouraged feedback from people, staff and professionals involved in people’s care. This assessment covered the ‘Homecare’ assessment service group (ASG) for Pathways of Hope. This part of the service did not support people living with a learning disability, although the provider is registered with CQC with a service user band of Learning Diability. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices and independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people and providers must have regard to it.
PDF cached but not yet analysed by Claude; set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY and re-run npm run etl:reports -- --location 1-8317268432.
Pathways of Hope improved from Inadequate to Requires Improvement overall following a focused inspection, with Safe and Effective rated Good after resolving prior breaches of Regulations 17 and 19. Well-led remains Requires Improvement as care plan completion, risk assessment documentation and governance oversight require further sustained embedding.
Concerns (5)
moderateGovernance: “more work needs to be done with regard to the completion of care plans, risk assessments, and audits”
moderateCare planning: “I still haven't received my care plan. It's meant to be arriving any time soon”
moderateStaff competency: “One staff member didn't know how to change a catheter bag, and I had to tell them”
moderateLeadership: “service management and leadership was inconsistent. Leaders and the culture they created did not always support the delivery of high-quality, person-centred care”
minorPerson-centred care: “I think the company leaves a lot to be desired, but the carers are very good. The company has been disorganised, but they have got better lately”
Strengths
· Safe recruitment processes implemented with all necessary checks including DBS completed across 5 reviewed staff files
· Medicines managed safely with staff completing Level 1 and 2 training and annual competency assessments
· Consent to care and treatment gained lawfully with MCA training completed by staff and documented in care plans
· Risks identified, assessed and managed safely with detailed care plans guiding staff on mitigation
· Provider proactively sought external advice, visited other care providers and attended care show to learn and improve
Quality-Statement breakdown (12)
safe: Staffing and recruitment; Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuseGood
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and managementGood
safe: Using medicines safelyGood
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
safe: Learning lessons when things go wrongGood
effective: Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidanceGood
effective: Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standards, guidance and the lawGood
effective: Staff support: induction, training, skills and experience
Pathways of Hope was rated Inadequate overall following a focused inspection in November 2022, with continued and repeated regulatory breaches in safe recruitment (Regulation 19) and governance (Regulation 17) placing the service in special measures. Key failures included unsafe staff recruitment practices, backdated care records, failure to notify CQC of safeguarding incidents, unlawful consent practices, and persistent late or shortened care visits.
Concerns (9)
criticalStaffing levels: “Of the 4 staff files we reviewed, 3 did not contain sufficient information to be assured new staff were safe to work in care.”
criticalGovernance: “Governance of the service failed to identify areas for improvement and actions taken by the registered manager at the last 2 inspections were not sufficient.”
criticalRecord keeping: “The records they sent to us had not been created until we had requested them, although they were dated earlier, and had not been evident when we reviewed people's care plans.”
criticalIncident learning: “Some incidents of abuse or alleged abuse had not been notified to CQC as required and in line with regulatory requirements.”
criticalLeadership: “The registered manager has failed to make sufficient improvements since the last inspection. The service has been rated as Requires Improvement at the last 3 consecutive inspections.”
moderateMissed or late visits: “On average, some carers arrived from between 15 to 24 minutes later than scheduled. One person said care staff stayed for 8 minutes on one call, when they were paying for 30-minute visits.”
moderateConsent / capacity: “A document within their care record stated they may not always want to take their prescribed medicines and this was their choice. This document had been signed by the person's relative on their behalf.”
moderateCare planning: “There were no care plans or detailed information and guidance for staff about people's specific health conditions and how these affected their day-to-day living.”
moderateMedication management: “A MAR for this person showed significant gaps in recording. Between 1 and 18 November, medicines were 'not taken' on over 70 occasions.”
Strengths
· Staff completed a range of training to meet people's specific needs and Regulation 18 breach was remedied by this inspection.
· Staff demonstrated good understanding of safeguarding, infection control and use of PPE.
· Medicines administration was trained and competency-checked; people received medicines as prescribed where staff administered them.
· Staff worked proactively with health professionals including GPs, district nurses, occupational therapists and speech and language therapists.
· The service arranged culturally matched carers where people expressed a preference, including language compatibility.
Quality-Statement breakdown (11)
safe: Staffing and recruitment / Fit and proper persons employed (Regulation 19)Inadequate
safe: Missed or late visits / call monitoringRequires improvement
safe: Using medicines safelyGood
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
safe: Learning lessons when things go wrongRequires improvement
effective: Staff support: induction, training, skills and experience (Regulation 18)Good
effective: Ensuring consent to care and treatment in line with law and guidance (MCA)Requires improvement
effective: Assessing people's needs and delivering care in line with standards