Date of inspection: 8 December 2025. The reason for the inspection was to follow up on previous regulatory breaches. The provider was previously in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safe and effective staffing and good governance. Improvements were found at this inspection, and the provider was no longer in breach of these regulations. Holmwood Gardens is a supported living service that provides personal care and support to people with learning disabilities and/or autism, who live in their own homes in the community. At the time of inspection, the service supported 18 people who received a regulated activity of personal care. We expect health and social care providers to guarantee people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equity, dignity, choices and independence and good services across local communities that most people take for granted. ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ is the guidance CQC follows to make assessments and judgements about services supporting people with a learning disability and autistic people, and providers must have regard to it. The provider had strengthened their learning culture, and improvements had been made in incident analysis. Themes, patterns, and trends from incidents were consistently identified, and learning opportunities acted upon. As a result, the registered manager had a more in-depth oversight of these processes, ensuring reviews were thorough and lead to meaningful improvements in practice. This enhanced approach supports reflective learning and the reduction of incidents, demonstrating significant progress since our last inspection. Positive changes had been made to strengthen staff support, training, and compliance. Staff received ongoing training and guidance, and they spoke positively about the support provided. Records confirm that the service was consistently meeting the provider’s compliance expectations, reflecting a significant improvement since the last inspection. Staff received regular safeguarding training and demonstrated a clear understanding of their roles and responsibilities in protecting people from risks and avoidable harm. These improvements promoted a safer, more informed culture and empowered individuals to understand and exercise their rights. Staff told us they felt confident when supporting people who displayed distressed behaviours. This increased confidence reflected the impact of ongoing training and guidance, enabling staff to respond in a calm, person-centred way that prioritises dignity and wellbeing. Staff were supported and had received relevant training to manage people’s emotional distress effectively. The provider had strengthened their approach by embedding positive behaviour support practices and continued to work with the local authority’s Positive Behaviour Support team for additional guidance and best practice implementation.
PDF cached but not yet analysed by Claude; set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY and re-run npm run etl:reports -- --location 1-4025711379.
Date of inspection 7 July 2025 to 25 July 2025. The inspection was prompted due to concerns received about safe care and treatment and a lack of effective management oversight. Concerns related to poor staff practice, medication management and safeguarding concerns. Holmwood Gardens provides personal care for people living in their own tenancies. The service provides support to autistic people and to people with learning disabilities. At the time of our inspection there were 18 people receiving a regulated activity under the registered location. We assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted. People had progression plans in place to develop new skills and experiences which staff supported people to achieve. Relationships which were important to people were developed by staff teams to maintain important connections with family and friends. We identified under the key questions Safe and Well Led the service was in breach of legal regulations in relation to safe care and treatment, safe and effective staffing and good governance. Risk management in relation to how individual’s emotional and behavioural needs were assessed, planned for and mitigated were not sufficiently robust and at times meant people were not safe from potential and actual harm. People with acute health conditions did not have their health needs managed safely. Staff were not always deployed to meet people’s needs. They also lacked training, skills and knowledge to support people effectively to manage distressed behaviours and specific health care tasks. Incidents were not managed or reported in line with the provider’s policy. Leaders of the service did not have effective oversight, knowledge and understanding of people’s behavioural and emotional needs and the management of incidents was poor and did not lead to a culture of learning and improvement. The provider was previously in breach of legal regulation in relation to good governance. Improvements were not found at this assessment, and the provider remained in breach of this regulation. We have asked the provider for an action plan in response to the concerns found at this assessment.
PDF cached but not yet analysed by Claude; set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY and re-run npm run etl:reports -- --location 1-4025711379.
Holmwood Gardens was rated Requires Improvement overall following its August 2022 inspection, with a breach of Regulation 17 (Good Governance) identified due to ineffective quality monitoring systems, unrobust recruitment checks, inconsistent medicines management, and gaps in staff training oversight. Strengths were noted in person-centred caring and responsive practices, with staff demonstrating genuine knowledge of and commitment to the people they supported.
Concerns (9)
criticalSafeguarding: “Some staff told us they did not feel confident in raising a safeguarding incident or concern with the management team. They believed they would not be listened to or action taken.”
criticalGovernance: “The provider had failed to ensure there were effective quality monitoring systems and processes in place to monitor quality and safety of the service. Breach of Regulation 17.”
moderateMedication management: “People's medicines folder did not include details of any allergies or how they liked to take their medicines. Handwritten entries on MAR did not consistently have two staff signatures.”
moderateCare planning: “One person had specific health care needs, but their support plans and risk assessments had not been updated to reflect changes in their care needs.”
moderateStaff training: “The provider's staff training plan was not made available during or post inspection...we were unable to confirm staff had received ongoing training.”
moderateSupervision / appraisal: “Staff supervision and appraisals were not consistently recorded. The staff support plan reviewed showed gaps in the frequency staff had received opportunities to discuss their work.”
moderateRecord keeping: “We found one staff member's file to be missing. Another staff file found part of their DBS was missing.”
moderateLeadership: “Some staff reported favouritism of staff by some members of the management team. This impacted on staff's confidence to raise issues, concerns or complaints.”
minorEnd-of-life care: “End of life care wishes had not been discussed or planned for with people and or relatives. The registered manager told us they were aware this needed to be addressed.”
Strengths
· People received personalised, person-centred care and support promoting choice, independence and dignity, consistent with 'Right support, right care, right culture' guidance.
· Staff demonstrated good knowledge of people's individual needs, communication methods and routines, and were observed to be kind and respectful.
· People were supported to lead active and fulfilling lives, accessing community activities, holidays, and maintaining family and social relationships.
· Effective infection prevention and control practices were in place, including PPE, COVID-19 risk assessments and regular testing.
· People were supported with their healthcare needs, including attending appointments and working positively with external health and social care professionals.
Quality-Statement breakdown (24)
safe: Systems and processes to safeguard people from the risk of abuseRequires improvement
safe: Assessing risk, safety monitoring and managementRequires improvement
safe: Staffing and recruitmentRequires improvement
safe: Using medicines safelyRequires improvement
safe: Preventing and controlling infectionGood
safe: Learning lessons when things go wrongGood
effective: Staff support: induction, training, skills and experienceRequires improvement
effective: Assessing people's needs and choices; delivering care in line with standards, guidance and the law
Holmwood Gardens Domiciliary Care Services was rated Good overall, with safe, effective, caring and responsive domains all rated Good, supported by strong person-centred care, robust safeguarding and effective medicines management. The Well-led domain was rated Requires Improvement due to inconsistent staff supervision frequency, absence of annual appraisals, incomplete audits, and lack of formalised recorded meetings between the registered provider and registered manager.
Concerns (5)
moderateSupervision / appraisal: “the frequency of staff supervisions was not consistent. There was no evidence in the files we viewed that staff had had an annual appraisal.”
moderateGovernance: “there were no formalised meetings with minutes as to what had been discussed and the actions agreed.”
moderateIncident learning: “the agenda of meetings did not provide an opportunity for staff to learn from incidents and events to make changes to their care practices.”
moderateGovernance: “we found some audits had not been completed. This supports the need for the regular and targeted supervision of staff.”
minorRecord keeping: “We found some staff records did not provide evidence that they had received an induction when they commenced work.”
Strengths
· People felt safe and expressed satisfaction with the service; positive relationships developed between staff and people using the service and their families.
· Personalised risk assessments and care plans provided clear guidance for staff, with assistive technology used to promote safety and independence.
· Robust medication management in place, including competency assessments for staff administering medicines and PEG feeding.
· Staff received training in safeguarding, infection control, epilepsy awareness, enteral feeding, autism and learning disability awareness.
· MCA principles understood and implemented, including best interest decisions and Court of Protection referrals where required.
Quality-Statement breakdown (18)
safe: SafeguardingGood
safe: Risk assessment and managementGood
safe: Staffing and recruitmentGood
safe: Medicines managementGood
safe: Infection controlGood
effective: Assessment of needsGood
effective: Staff training and competencyGood
effective: Staff supervision and appraisalRequires improvement
Good
effective: Supporting people to eat and drink enough to maintain a balanced dietGood
effective: Supporting people to live healthier lives and access healthcare servicesGood
effective: The Mental Capacity Act and consentGood
caring: Ensuring people are well treated and supported; respecting equality and diversityGood
caring: Supporting people to express their views and be involved in making decisions about their careGood
caring: Respecting and promoting people's privacy, dignity and independenceGood
responsive: Planning personalised care to ensure people have choice and controlGood
responsive: Meeting people's communication needsGood
responsive: Supporting people to develop and maintain relationships and avoid social isolationGood
responsive: Improving care quality in response to complaints or concernsGood
responsive: End of life care and supportRequires improvement
well-led: Managers and staff being clear about their roles, quality performance, risks and regulatory requirementsRequires improvement
well-led: Promoting a positive culture that is person-centred, open, inclusive and empoweringRequires improvement
well-led: How the provider understands and acts on the duty of candourGood
well-led: Engaging and involving people using the service, the public and staffRequires improvement
well-led: Working in partnership with othersGood
effective: Meeting nutritional and dietary needs
Good
effective: Mental Capacity Act complianceGood
caring: Relationships and person-centred approachGood
caring: Privacy, dignity and confidentialityGood
responsive: Care planning and reviewGood
responsive: Communication needsGood
responsive: Complaints handlingGood
well-led: Leadership and managementRequires improvement
well-led: Governance and quality monitoringRequires improvement
well-led: Staff engagement and learning from incidentsRequires improvement